18 C
London
Saturday, October 1, 2022

The “institutional respect” that referees ask for victims’ claims: gay, four-game sanctions

TAD confirms the conviction of the Valencia captain for commenting on the referee in a match last season. Cucho Hernández is the only precedent with Getafe in 2020 and the list of unapproved files includes Coman, Pique, Pellegrini or Iago Aspas.

Valencia’s captain, José Luis Gay, was held by Alderette in a duel the previous season.EFE

Spanish Federationupon your request referee technical committee (CTA), it was proposed that the referee’s figure be questioned after each game without players or coaches being able to assess their own decisions. “Institutional honours”, the CTA president called it last Tuesday, Luis Medina Cantalejo, And there is a provision of punishment for doing so. you know well jose luis gayWho was banned by the Competition Committee for four matches. Court of Arbitration for Sports (TAD) confirmed yesterday. The Valencia captain will not be able to debut in the league until 10 September. A loss for Gattuso and a further complication in his intention to be on the list luis enrique For the World Cup in Qatar.

The Contest informed Valencia on 25 June that, after the Integrity Complaint, Article 100 bis disciplinary code on behalf of the RFEF and sanctioned him with a four-game suspension and a fine of 601-euro, as the regulation states, “subject to sports discipline of statements made by any person by any means through which any Member’s honesty and fairness to arbitration groups or RFEF bodies as well as statements that disapprove of the activity of any member of the above groups when they are treated with contempt or when using offensive, abusive, abusive or offensive language is used. vulgar”.

The statements for which Gay has been punished were made about the penalty not indicated by Melero López after the defeat against Osasuna (1–2) at Mestalla on 16 April: “The referee has seen it and Don’t want to call it. We’ll fight against it. Everything and go on. You can’t say anything because they give you a yellow card like me in the end. They do what they want.”

The competition valued the footballer’s words and, despite the allegations, approved him, a criterion that did not change on appeal and caused Valencia to resort to TAD, which took a month to decide, without accepting the injunction. took longer than that he should have served the punishment and angered Valencia.

In a statement of support for its captain, the club expressed its “deep outrage at the irregular and unreasonable acceptance” and “highlighted the apparent comparative guilt with respect to other matters that are similar or even comparable to homosexual.” was not sanctioned with harsh demonstrations. Or, if they were, the sanction was rescinded”.

just an example

This is not the first time that a file has been opened on players or coaches for statements outside the playing field, but there is only one case in which they have not been raised. In December 2020, Getafe players kucho hernandez He added that Gil Manzano received the same punishment for not paying a fine and accusing him of “outrageous”, “threatening from the first minute”. The Azulán team, then coached by Bordels, did not file an appeal since the Colombian was injured.

However, there are many more cases in which files have been opened that are being archived. was the last ego around What was the value of the three penalties as stated by González Fuertes at Celta-Real Madrid (1-2):”he just needed one more beep [penalti] To throw Pablo ([el rbitro],It looked like he was looking for a hat-trick from Benzema.” The allegations of the Galician Club were accepted by the competition and the acceptance motion was buried.

so were Gerard Pickthat a. in chat with youtuber ensured that “85% [de los rbitros] He is from Madrid. How are they not whistling in Madrid’s favour? Even inadvertently, how would they not throw more than one side of the other?” In this case, the statements are framed “without questioning the honesty or fairness of the legitimate exercise of the constitutional right to free expression”. ref. ” was understood. the same fate followed them Ronald Komen Barra after his first Clasico on the bench.

There was an acceptance motion for former Betis goalscorers Joel and Manuel Pellegrini to complain after de Burgos Bengoechia’s arbitration and VAR decisions at Betis-Real Madrid, but the coach again appealed for freedom of expression.

Avoiding punishment was more difficult for former Cadiz coach lvaro Cervera, who had to reach TAD after assessing Alberola Rojas’s mediocrity in the duel against Granada. “Regarding fines, I think that’s a question I’m going to answer, but there’s a lot of it because everybody’s seen it, yes.there’s only one person, or three, because one is down and two are up no other explanation,

The TAD held that the ban imposed was “based on a subjective judgment about the intention of the appellant not based on the literalness of the words used. Therefore, there is a reasonable doubt (…) in the intent of the statements made. It has been added that, by effecting the limits of freedom of expression, restrictive interpretation of the said limits should be above all because the demonstrations fall on matters of public interest.

In Valencia they cannot understand how Gay’s words can be interpreted in any way other than within the framework of freedom of expression.

Don’t Trust On this News and Website Maybe it’s Fake

Reference from www.elmundo.es

Latest news
Related news