The previous president blames his successor for the introduced losses of 487 million euros, accuses him of not making the most of earnings alternatives reminiscent of these of the CVC fund and wonders why he has forgiven Neymar 16.5 million euros
The warfare between factions in Barcelona is as soon as once more bloody. Josep Maria Bartomeu, former president of Barcelona and a kind of investigated for the ‘Baragate’ plot, has reappeared on the general public scene. Though it was by means of an intensive letter despatched to the EFE company. In it, along with defending his administration, he accuses his successor within the armchair, Joan Laporta, of “inaction” and warns him that, in line with the statutes, the brand new board is chargeable for these introduced losses of 487 million euros in comparison with final 12 months.
Bartomeu tries to not depart something within the inkwell. He factors to Laporta for not having utilized financial measures that, in line with the previous president, he himself couldn’t take as a result of he resigned from his publish on October 27, 2020. A departure, in line with him, “caused by the intransigence of the Procicat (Territorial Plan Civil Protection of Catalonia). “As a direct consequence of our dismissal, we weren’t in a position to apply the financial and monetary measures (Bara Company, discount of the wage mass, doable bonus from the Tremendous League and / or bonus from the LaLiga-CVC settlement) deliberate towards the 375 million euros of earnings discount because of the affect of Covid. Measures that your new board would have needed to apply “.
Bartomeu says he feels “shocked” at those losses of 487 million euros proclaimed by Laporta on the day of the goodbye of Messi. “I hope it isn’t like in 2003, after we attempt to provision as losses the guide worth of the pending amortization of sure gamers. Do not forget that it was not a call accepted then by the Provincial Courtroom of Barcelona,” the former leader tells his successor.
What Bartomeu has no doubt in assuming his responsibility is sports planning. “With fairly good sporting outcomes, and being particularly glad with the contributions from the quarry.”
Regarding one of the thorniest issues, the reduction of the wage bill, Bartomeu assures that he did his part: “Our board utilized a non-repayable discount of 12% in wages to all of the gamers, technicians and sports activities professionals of the membership with impact within the 2019-20 season, which served to alleviate, a minimum of partially, the autumn in earnings. “And he continues:” On the finish of the summer season of 2020 it was agreed to suggest to the identical gamers and coaches an adjustment and deferral of salaries based mostly on the anticipated gradual return to public on the Camp Nou, which is anticipated from February 2021. “Provisions that turned out to be unsuccessful.
Although Bartomeu assures that if he had continued in the presidency until his term was exhausted, he would have made further cuts: “In keeping with our plan, within the case of retaining the services closed till June 2021, it was vital to use a new discount in wages, on this case 20% (about 90 million), for the needs of the 2020-21 season “.
Bartomeu assures that during his presidential tour, the club “at all times complied with the wage ratio of the League and the restrict of UEFA’s monetary Honest Play so as to stay aggressive towards the Premier League and the ‘club-states'”.
On the other hand, he points out Laporta for having reached a judicial agreement with Neymar to settle all open disputes with the club: “The choice to forgive 16.5 million euros to the previous participant Neymar within the framework of a dispute the place the expectations in favor of Barcelona have been fairly clear and the auditor didn’t oblige, in any method In that case, to provide any amount.Why was this determination made opposite to the pursuits of the membership?
Bartomeu additionally requires Laporta to indicate “as soon as possible” the conclusions of the “audit and / or due diligence“Relating to his administration. Laporta identified throughout his final public look that there have been suspicions of” allegedly criminal “conduct. in adopting the pertinent authorized measures to make clear them and, if vital, punish these alleged unlawful actions “.