15.3 C
Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Juror in Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation case says actress’ story ‘doesn’t add up’

A juror speaking in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation case, and explaining how the jury eventually came to terms with Depp.

The six-week trial began three years after Depp filed a $50 million defamation suit against Heard in March 2019. Washington Post The op-ed she wrote explained in detail how she became a victim of domestic violence. While Depp’s name was not mentioned in the article, the piece came to light as their controversial 2016 divorce continued to make headlines. Depp eventually won the case when the jury unanimously decided that he was defamed by Heard and “acted with genuine malice,” and awarded him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. . Hurd, for her part, was awarded $2 million in compensatory damages by the jury for her counterclaim, but nothing in punitive damages. The jury found Depp liable after his attorney referred to Heard’s claims as “hoax.”

Speaking with ABC News, a juror at the trial said that a lot of Heard’s story “didn’t connect with her”. ABC News did not disclose the name of the juror who spoke, but identified her as “one of five men on the jury,” while the other two of the seven jurors were women.

“The crying, the facial expressions that were hers, the staring at the jury – we were all very uncomfortable…,” said Jur in a segment aired on Thursday good Morning America, “She’d answer a question and she’d cry and then two seconds later she’d go cold… Some of us used the expression ‘crocodile tears’.”

The jury shared that many on the jury saw Heard as the attacker, not Depp. “A lot of the jury felt that at the end of the day what he was saying was more credible,” the jury said. “He seemed a little more genuine in terms of how he was answering questions. His emotional state was completely stable.”

As for how they came to their decision, the jury said they “followed the evidence.”

“Finally I think it was true that they were both abusing each other,” the jury said. “I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. But to get to the level of what she was claiming, there was enough or no evidence that would actually support what she was saying. was.”

Another reason for their decision was that Heard had not donated the $7 million divorce settlement to charity as he had promised.

“She goes to a talk show in the UK The video shows her sitting there telling the host that she gave all that money, and the words she used in that video clip were, ‘I’ve got it. Gave it up, “I donated it,” it’s gone, “but the fact is he didn’t give it very far,” the juror called the situation a “failure.”

Just this week, Heard said in an interview with NBC News’ Savannah Guthrie that she still plans to honor her vow. The 36-year-old actress said, “I made a vow, and that vow is made by its nature over time.”

She also told Guthrie that she does not blame the jury for her decision.

“I don’t blame them. I really understand,” Heard told Guthrie. “He’s a beloved character and people think they know him. He’s a fantastic actor.”

aquaman The star also talked about how she didn’t believe she was properly represented on social media during the six-week trial.

Heard said, “I don’t care what anyone thinks of me or what you decide to do in the privacy of my own home, at my wedding, behind closed doors.” “I don’t believe the average person. Those things should be known. And so I don’t take it personally. But even someone who maintains that I deserve all this hate and opposition, Even if you think I’m lying, you still can’t look me in the eye and tell me you think social media is a fair representation.”

She repeated, “You can’t tell me you think it’s fair.”

Related Content:

™ and © 2022 CBS Studios Inc. and CBS Interactive Inc., the Paramount companies. All rights reserved.

Do not put your faith in this news source or website. You never know…

Reference from www.etonline.com

Latest news
- Advertisement -
Related news